As a community service, an educational series by the

IP and Business Law Offices of Howard L. Hoffenberg, Esq.

Index of Cases in Tour of US Supreme Court Patent Cases from 1961 to 1999

***

A Fast and Easy Way to Learn the High Points of Patent Law and Related Anti-trust Law

Copyright 2010 The IP and Business Law Offices of Howard L. Hoffenberg, Esq. All Rights Reserved.

Return to Index of Tour of US Supreme Court Patent Cases from 1961 to 1999

ARO MFG. CO. v.CONVERTIBLE TOP (Aro I) 365 U.S. 336 (February 27, 1961)

UNITED STATES v. SINGER MFG. CO., 374 U.S. 174 (June 17, 1963)

COMPCO CORP. v. DAY-BRITE LIGHTING, 376 U.S. 234 (March 9, 1964)

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. v. STIFFEL CO., 376 U.S. 225 (March 9, 1964)

ARO MFG. CO. v. CONVERTIBLE TOP, INC. [Aro II], 377 U.S. 476 (June 8, 1964)

BRULOTTE v. THYS CO., 379 U.S. 29 (November 16, 1964)

WALKER PROCESS v. FOOD MACHINERY, 382 U.S. 172 (December 6, 1965)

GRAHAM v. JOHN DEERE CO., 383 U.S. 1 (February 21, 1966)

BRENNER v. MANSON, 383 U.S. 519 (March 21, 1966)

LEAR, INC. v. ADKINS, 395 U.S. 653 (June 16, 1969)

BLONDER- TONGUE v. UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, 402 U.S. 313 (May 3, 1971)

UNITED STATES v. GLAXO GROUP, 410 U.S. 52 (January 22, 1973)

KEWANEE OIL CO. v. BICRON CORP., 416 U.S. 470 (May 13, 1974)

PARKER v. FLOOK, 437 U.S. 584 (June 22, 1978)

ARONSON v. QUICK POINT PENCIL CO., 440 U.S. 257 (February 28, 1979)

DIAMOND v. CHAKRABARTY, 447 U.S. 303 (June 16, 1980)

DAWSON CHEMICAL CO. v. ROHM & HAAS CO., 448 U.S. 176 (June 27, 1980)

DENNISON MFG. CO. v. PANDUIT CORP., 475 U.S. 809 (April 21, 1986)

BONITO BOATS, INC. v. THUNDER CRAFT BOATS, INC., 489 U.S. 141 (February 21, 1989)

LILLY & CO. v. MEDTRONIC, INC., 496 U.S. 661 (June 18, 1990)

CARDINAL CHEMICAL v. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, 508 U.S. 83 (May 17, 1993)

MARKMAN v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC. (April 23, 1996)

WARNER JENKINSON COMPANY, INC. v. HILTON DAVIS CHEMICAL CO. (March 3, 1997)

PFAFF v. WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. (November 10, 1998)

DICKINSON v. ZURKO (June 10, 1999)

FLORIDA PREPAID POSTSECONDARY v. COLLEGE SAVINGS BANK (June 23, 1999)

Community Service and

Pro Bono

In addition to this education series, Mr. Hoffenberg gives of his time to benefit the community and contribute to the quality justice in the State of California. For many years, he served as a volunteer pro tem in the Municipal Court in traffic, landlord-tenant, small claims and short cause matters. Currently, Mr. Hoffenberg serves as a volunteer arbitrator for the Dispute Resolution Service in attorney-client fee disputes and as a quasi-volunteer mediator in the Court of Appeals.